Jean-Pierre Bemba convicted of witness tampering

jean-pierre-bemba

The former Congolese Vice President, Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, who is serving an 18-year prison sentence for crimes against humanity and war crimes, was convicted of coaching witnesses and bribing them to give false testimony.

The applicable law was Article 70(1) of the Rome Statute which addresses various forms of conduct that may encroach upon the integrity and efficacy of the proceedings before the Court. The ICC noted that 14 key witnesses had been coached about what to say and that Bemba and four other defendants had conspired to present false evidence. The facts of the case included:

The summary of the judgement reads in part:

In the light of the foregoing, the Chamber is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that Mr Bemba, jointly with Mr Kilolo and Mr Mangenda, committed the offence of corruptly influencing 14 Main Case defence witnesses within the meaning of Articles 70(1)(c) and 25(3)(a) of the Statute.

The Chamber found Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo guilty, under Articles 70(1)(b) and (c), in conjunction with Article 25(3)(a) of the Statute, of having corruptly influenced D-2, D-3, D-4, D-6, D-13, D-15, D-23, D-25, D-26, D-29, D-54, D-55, D-57, and D-64 and having presented their false evidence as co-perpetrator; guilty, under Article 70(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 25(3)(b) of the Statute, of having solicited the giving of false testimony by witnesses D-2, D-3, D-4, D-6, D-13, D-15, D-23, D-25, D-26, D-29, D-54, D-55, D-57, and D-64.

The verdict was delivered by Trial Chamber VII of the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Wednesday 19 October 2016 at 14:30 (Hague local time). For these types of offences, according to the Rome Statute, the judges may impose a term of imprisonment not exceeding five years and/or a fine. “No legal system in the world can accept the bribing of witnesses, the inducement of witnesses to lie or the illicit coaching of witnesses,” said the presiding judge, Bertram Schmitt, “Today’s judgment sends the clear message that the court is not willing to allow its proceedings to be hampered or destroyed.”

The Chamber will be pronouncing the penalties at a subsequent stage.

 

Exit mobile version